APPENDIX E
TABLE OF STATUTES and CASE LAW referenced since 06/84.
ARTICLE I, Section 8, clause 3 - - COMMERCE CLAUSE
NATL. LEAGUE OF CITIES v USERY 426 US 833, 49 L Ed 2d 245 (1976)
ARTICLE I, Section 8, clause 8 - - Intellectual Property
ARTICLE IV, Section 1 - - Full Faith & Credit
ARTICLE IV, Section 2 - - Privileges & Immunities
First Amendment: Speech, Assembly, Redress
i) INTERSTATE CIRCUITS v DALLAS 390 US 676, 20 L Ed 2d 225 (1968)
ii) NRLB v CONTINENTAL OIL 159 F 2d 326 (1947)
iii) HESS v INDIANA 414 US 105, 38 L Ed 2d 303 (1973)
iv) CANTWELL v CONNECTICUT N/A religion
v) HUNTLEY v PUBLIC UTL. COMM. 69 CAL Rptr. 37 (1968)
vi) GOODING v WILSON 405 US 518, 31 L Ed 2d 408 (1972) N/A
vii) F.C.C. & U.S. v RED LION BROAD. ?
viii) LARGENT v TEXAS 318 US 418, 87 L Ed 873 (1943) N/A
ix) GRAUSAM v MURPHEY (1971) N/A
x) FINK v COLE 97 NE 2d 55
xi) KEYISIAN v BOARD OF REGENTS 385 US 589, 17 L Ed 2d 629 (1967)
a) ZACCHINI v SCRIPPS-HOWARD B. 433 US 562, 53 L. Ed 2d 965 (1977)
b) CENT. HUDSON GAS v PSC of NY 447 US 557, 65 L. Ed 2d 341(1980)
c) BUSH v LUCAS 103 S. Ct. 2404 (1983)
d) BUCKLEY v VALEO 424 US 1, 46 L Ed 2d 659 (1976)
Fifth Amendment: Due Process & Equal Protection
i) NEBBIA v NY 291 US 502, (1933)
ii) PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. v CHEEK 259 US , 66 L Ed 1044 (1921) corps.
iii) JOHNSON v ROBISON 415 US 361, 39 L Ed 2d 389 (1974)
iv) RASULIS v WEINBERGER 502 F 2d 500
v) USD of A v MORENO 413 US 528, 37 L Ed 782 (1973)
vi) U.S. v ANTELOPE 96 S Ct. 1100 (1976)
vii) ANNOTATION: Due Process - he 5th & 14th Amendments. 47 L Ed 2d 975
a) HECKLER v MATHEWS 104 S. Ct. 1387 (1984)
b) USRRB v FRITZ 449 US 166, 66 L. Ed 2d 368 (1980)
c) SCHWEIKER v WILSON 450 us 221, 67 L.Ed 2d 186 (1981)
d) APTHEKER v SEC. OF STATE 378 US 500, 12 L Ed 2d 992 (1964)
e) GREENE v McELROY 360 US 474, 3 L Ed 2d 1377 (1959)
f) ADAIR v U.S. 208 US 161, 67 L Ed 437 (1908)
Ninth Amendment: Privacy
RIGHT OF PRIVACY - - Annotation: 43 L Ed 2d 871 S. Ct. views.
Tenth Amendment: States Rights
a) NATL LEAGUE OF CITIES v USERY 426 US 833, 49 L Ed 2d 245 (1976)
Fourteenth Amendment: Equal Protection
i) YICK WO v HOPKINS 118 US 220, 225 (1886)
ii) LOUISVILLE GAS & ELECTRIC 227 US 32, 72 L Ed 770 (1928)
iii) FROST v CORP. COMMISSION OF OK 278 US 515, 522 (1929)
iv) TRUAX v CORRIGAN 257 US 312 (1921)
v) SHAPIRO v THOMPSON 394 US 618, 22 L Ed 2d 600 (1969)
vi) COMMONWEALTH v INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER N/A
vii) FREEDMAN v MARYLAND N/A
viii) BARROWS v JACKSON 346 US 429 (1953) regarding Cal. enforce.
ix) GRAYNED v ROCKFORD 408 US 104, 33 L Ed 2d 222 (1972)
x) BLUMENTHAL v BOARD MED. EXAM 18 Cal Rptr. 501 const.
xi) PEOPLE (CA) v DUFFY 79 CA 2d Supp. 875; 179 p 2d 876 (1947)
xii) BYERS v BOARD OF SUPER. 262 CA 2d 148 (1968) constitutionality
Const. Amend. 14:
b) CLEMENTS v FASHING 102 S. Ct. 2836 (1982)
c) WASH. v SEATTLE SCHOOL DIST. 458 US 457, 73 L. Ed 2d 896 (1982)
d) CHALMERS v CITY OF LA 762 F 2d 753 (1985)
e) MINN. v CLOVER LEAF CREAMERY 449 US 456, 66 L. Ed 2d 659 (1981)
Ninth Circuit: 14th Amendment cases
f) HOFFMAN v U.S. 767 F 2d 1431 (1985)
g) RICHARDS v SEC. OF STATE 752 F 2d 1413 (1985)
h) PARKS v WATSON 716 F 2d 646 (1983)
i) LEGAL AID SOC. OF ALA. CTY v BRENNAN 608 F 2d 1319 (1979)
j) ADAMS v HOWERTON 673 F 2d 1036 (1982)
k) HIRST v GERTZEN 676 F 2d 1252 (1982)
Trademark Act of 1946: Title 15 U.S.C. §§1051 et seq..
i) UNITED DRUG v THEO RECTANUS 248 US 90, 63 L Ed 141 (1918)
ii) AMER. STEEL FOUNDRIES v ROBERTSON 70 L Ed 317, (1925)
iii) STANDARD PAINT. v TRINIDAD ASPH. 220 US 453, 55 L Ed 536 (1910)
iv) G. & C. MERRIAM CO. v SAALFIELD 198 F. 369 (1912)
v) FURNITURE HOSP. v DORFMAN 166 SW 862 (1914)
vi) CORNING GLASS WORKS v PASMANTIER DC NY (1939)
vii) WALKER PROCESS v FOOD CORP. 382 US 172, 15 L Ed 2d 247 (1965)
viii) U.S. v US GYPSUM CO. 333 US 364, 92 L Ed 762 (1947)
ix) QUAKER STATE v STEINBERG N/A
a) VUITTON ET FILS S.A. v J. YOUNG ENT. 644 F 2d 769 (1981)
b) ROYER v STOODY CO. False publications ("Crossroads")
c) REDKEN v CLAIROL INC. (IMPOVERISH LANGUAGE OF COMMERCE)
d) ELLAY STORES v SAVITZ 30 F Supp 462 (1939)
e) Application of DEISTER 289 F 2d 496 (1961) Patent law.
f) CONFUSION OF SOURCE [treatise 1st restatements torts - chap. 35
Copyright Act of 1976: Title 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.
COPYRIGHTABLE MATERIALS ¶ 505 - ¶ 2175
Entire code 17 U.S.C. 101-118
UNIVERSAL COPYRIGHT CONVENTION [Revised] entire text.
Sherman/Clayton Act - - Title 15 U.S.C. Section 1
Actions involving extraterritorial conduct: 24 Fed. Proc. L Ed §§ 54:115-122
a) U.S. v SOCONY-VACUUM OIL 310 US 150, (1939)
b) TREASURE VALLEY POTATO v ORE-IDA FOODS (1974)
c) FINCK v SCHNEIDER GRANITE 86 SW ___(1905)
d) U. S. v PARAMOUNT PICTURES 334 US 131, 92 L Ed 1260 (1947)
e) TODHUNTER-MITCHELL v ANHEUSER BUSCH 375 F Supp 610 (1974)
f) FLINTKOTE v LYSFJORD 246 F 2d 368 (1957)
Sherman/Clayton Act: Title 15 U.S.C. Section 2
a) JERROLD ELEC. v WESCOAST BROAD. CO. 341 F 2d 653 (1965) N/A
b) U. S. v GRINNELL CORP. 384 US 563, 16 L Ed 2d 778 (1966)
c) BAUSH MACHINE v ALUM. CO. of AMER. 72 F 2d 236,240 (1934)
d) U.S. v AMERICAN TOBACCO CO. 221 US 106, 55 L Ed 2d 663 (1945)
e) U. S. v GRIFFITH 334 US 100, 92 L Ed 1236 (1947)
f) AMERICAN TOBACCO v U.S. 328 US 780, 90 L Ed 2d 1575 (1945)
g) PETO v HOWELL 101 F 2d 23 (1939)
h) UNITED SHOE MACH. CORP. v U.S. 374 US 521, 98 L Ed 910 (1953)
i) HILAND DAIRY v KROGER 402 F 2d 968 (1968)
Sherman/Clayton Act: Title 15 U.S.C. Section 15
STARK BROS. v STARK 255 us 31, J. Holmes op. on damages under §15
CLARK OIL CO. v PHILLIPS PETRO. 148 F 2d 580 (1945)
ANTITRUST - TREBLE DAMAGEs - 16 ALR Fed. Pg. 14-69, [Lost investment]
PUNITIVE or EXEMPLARY DAMAGES RECOVERABLE, 47 ALR 2d 1118
CIVIL RIGHTS REMEDIES - - [42 USC 1983] Regarding standards for determ. injuries. Case - PATON v LA PRADE n. 15, 524 F 2d 862 (1975)
CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE - 42 U.S.C. § 1983 from n 102-114, n 185-206, 522
Sherman/Clayton Act: Title 15 U.S.C. Section 24
U. S. v WISE 370 US 405, 8 L Ed 2d 590 (1962)
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
a) BUSHIE v STENOCORD No. 25536 (1972)
b) Asso. Press v U.S. 327 US 1-60 (1944)
c) MOORE v MATTHEWS No. 71-2186 (1972)
CASES INVOLVING THE OLYMPIC COMMITTEE
a) CHRIS BURTON v USOC No. 83-3088
b) MARTIN v I.O.C. 740 F 2d 670 (1985)
c) Stop The Olympic Prison v USOC
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
Protection of Industrial Property - - Convention of 1925
TRADEMARK AND COMMERCIAL PROTECTION - - Convention of 1929
Selected International Conventions - - Important regarding litigation.
PRINCIPALS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
Federal Rules Decisions
a) FINANCIAL SECURITIES LIT. v PENN MART REAL. 74 FRD 497 (1975)
b) SHERMAN PARK COMM. ASSO. v WAUWATOSA 486 F Supp 838 (1980)
c) HOCKLEY v ZENT 89 FRD 26 (1980)
d) ROESBERG v JOHNS MANVILLE CORP 85 FRD 292 (1980)
e) WEINER v STUART 76 FRD 624 (1977)
TREATISES with regard to CONGRESS
LOBBYING: A Constitutionally Protected Right
Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act of 1946 PL 79-601
CONGRESS AND LAW MAKING, Researching the Legislative Process
By: Robert Goehlert. Clio Books
CAPITOL HILL MANUAL - - Frank Cummings
THE SUPREME COURT - - 1965 TERM - - Archibald Cox
TREATISES/TEXT BOOKS
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - - AM JUR 2d, Volume 16-17, §§ 150-826
CONTROLLING TRIAL PUBLICITY - - 1 AM JUR TRIALS, 305-355
MOTION PICTURES AS EVIDENCE [Videos] - - AM JUR 8, 153-173
MONOPOLIES 54 AM JUR 2d, § 463-479, § 696-715, § 812-850
EVIDENCE - - 19 AM JUR 2d §§ 159-174, Presumptions & Inferences
OPENING STATEMENTS [Plaintiff & defendant] 5 AM JUR TRIALS, 285-329.
COMPARATOR FRCP & comparison to state rules.
DISCOVERY
HARVARD LAW REVIEW [Discovery] - - Vol. 74, 940-1046 (1960)
YALE LAW REVIEW [Discovery] - - Vol. 71, (1962) 371-436
REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS [Plaintiff] - - 4 AM JUR TRIALS, 186-209
GENERAL PROVISIONS OF RULE 26 [Discovery] pg. 1.211-3.108
TRADEMARK/UNFAIR COMPETITION - - treatises
TM Infringement/Unfair Competition Laws - - 8 AM JUR TRIALS, 363-482
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY REVIEWS - - 2 AM JUR 2d, § 653-711
GOVERNMENTAL *IMMUNITY OF EXEMP FROM ANTI-TRUST LAWS
12 ALR FED., 329-359.
WHITTEN v PADDOCK, [*Immunity] Columbia Law Review. Vol 71, 140-156
CALLMAN UNFAIR COMPETITION - - p. 94-105
ANTI-TRUST - TREBLE DAMAGES - 16 ALR Fed. 14-69, [Lost investment]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment